A.DEFINITION / REVIEW PHASE
1.Cover
Defines the core identity of the report.
• Project name / description
• Project type
• Location (general reference)
• Report date
• Brief introduction / report summary
2.Brief Profile of the Space
• Type of space
• User profile
• Operating model
• Current operational status
This section does not present an identity narrative. It describes an operational system as it currently functions.
3.Scope of the Report
This section clarifies the domains in which the report operates.
Within the scope of the report:
• Existing architectural, technical and implementation projects are reviewed and analyzed
• Architectural plans, implementation drawings, functional schemes and detail decisions are evaluated
• The experiential, physical and operational condition of the space is addressed as an integrated whole
• Functional and spatial deficiencies are identified
• Revision, development and strategic addition potentials are defined
The report also:
• Reviews compliance with applicable regulations
• Identifies potential technical and legal risks
The report does not focus solely on the interior space, it also covers:
• The immediate surroundings of the space
• The urban context
• Natural, cultural and regional potentials
Within this framework the report:
• Conducts environmental, topographical and morphological readings
• Analyzes regional and local points of attraction
• Evaluates which experiences,programs and activities the space is suitable for
The report also functions as a translation mechanism:
• Revision alternatives expressed through technical drawings and data
• Are translated into clear and accessible language for the project owner
This enables the project owner to:
• Avoid being over whelmed by technical detail
• Compare revision alternatives
• Manage the decision-making process consciously and confidently
B.DIAGNOSIS PHASE
(Reading– Identification – Analysis)
1.Analysis
This section forms the foundation of the report.
At this stage, the report examines together:
• The existing design
• Implementation decisions
• Operational realities
• The physical and experiential capacity of the space
Within the analysis:
• Architectural plans and implementation projects are examined
• Sectional, volumetric and scale relationships are evaluated
• Functional schemes are reviewed
• Existing materials, details and implementation decisions are assessed
• Regulations, escape scenarios and technical requirements are reviewed
2.Initial Reading: How Does the Space Work?
(Emotional and intuitive reading)
This phase involves experiential reading through time spent within the space.
• Overall feeling
• Arrival moment
• Circulation and rhythm
• Areas that cause fatigue, disconnection or stagnation
• Service and hospitality components (service experience, taste,texture, rituals) are recorded through bodily and experiential observation.
3.Spatial Diagnosis
Evaluatedthrough both technical data and lived experience.
• Experience breakpoints
• Areas that fail to realize their potential
• Contradictions
• Strong points lacking sufficient support
4.User Behaviors and Real Scenarios
At this stage, the report examines the gap between actual use and the intended experience.
• Actual usage patterns
• Differences between expected and lived experience
• Daily and temporal behaviors
• Problematic areas
5.Hidden Potentials of the Space and Its Context
The report does not propose demolition, it focuses on revelation.
• Existing but unused values
• Non-radical opportunities
• Areas where small interventions can generate high impact
C.RECOMMENDATION AND DEVELOPMENT PHASE
(What can be added to the space? How can the space be strengthened?)
1.Experience Scenario and Narrative Framework
Proposes an experiential framework.
• The narrative the space cancarry
• Emotional atmosphere
• A renewed relationship between space and user
2.Strategic Additions That Strengthen Experience
This section represents the report’s most distinctive layer.
It addresses:
• New programs to be added to the space
• Content that expands and enriches experience
• Addition scapable of transforming the space into a point of attraction
• Spatial and experiential interventions
• Object, art and narrative proposals
• Menu concepts; space-specific wine, cocktail or signature drink lists and service experience alternatives
• Activity, workshop and event proposals
• Programs that establish relationships with surrounding points of attraction
• Collaborations that integrate regional potentials
3.Feasibility and Filtering
• Budget
• Operations
• Seasonality
• Costs related to disruption of use
All recommendations are filtered through feasibility criteria.
4.Prioritization and Roadmap
• Presents a roadmap progressing from large scale to small scale
• Clarifies short-, mid- and long-term steps
• Observes impact-to-cost balance
D.DELIVERED DOCUMENTS
At the conclusion of the report, the project owner is provided with:
•Spatial diagnosis and analysis documents
• Experience andnarrative framework materials
• Strategic addition and development proposals
• Activity and program drafts
• Lists of environmental, regional and urban-scale points of attraction
• Topographical, morphological and environmental readings
• Prioritization and roadmap documents
• Budget forecasts
• Revision proposals supported by technical drawings(AutoCAD, Archicad, 3ds Max, ZBrush, etc.)
• Simplified and clearly articulated texts translating technical data into an accessible format for the project owner
Note –Post-Report Process (Optional)
After delivery of the report, upon request:
• Qualified expert teams for proposed revisions and developments may be suggested as alternatives. This guidance is non-binding; all final decisions remain with the project owner.
• If the project owner chooses to proceed with their own teams, In Between remains involved as an external perspective and consultant.
• Implementation is evaluated in relation to the goals defined in the report.
• Upon request, In Between may continue to accompany the process as an external advisor, conducting reviews at mutually agreed periodic intervals.